If you would like to post a comment to an existing post:

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO POST A COMMENT:

1) Find Blog Archive in the right hand column. Click on a particular month and then find a topic you're interested in. Another option is to find "Labels" in the right hand column. (Ex: Homework) Click on the label you're interested in and you'll have choice of posts on that topic appear in the middle column of the Blog.
2) Go to the end of the post where you'll find the word "comments" (or No Comments) highlighted. Click on this.
3) You'll then see a space to "enter your comment." At the bottom of that "page" you'll find a pull down menu asking you to "Comment as." You can pick Name/URL. If you pick Name/URL, then insert your name (or initials) and ignore the URL space. You'll note that most of the comments are submitted by contributors using their initials. This is because almost all of the current contributors are students in a course I teach at Salve.

4) Then, in the next box, click "continue". Then, you should click on the "Publish" button.
5) I'd ask that you refrain from critiquing individuals, unless they are public figures such as Obama, Duncan or Gist. I reserve the right to delete posts which I feel are "over the top." I'd prefer this Blog to involve a "battle of ideas" rather than a bashing of individuals. Also, please feel free to post alternative views or offer amendments to my assertions and/or specifics. I am far from being an expert on these matters, so there should be lots of room for amendments. If you look thru the Blog, you will see that I have included articles on opposite sides of issues (Ex: pro and con on Common Core; pro and con on Portfolio, etc)

You will also notice that I encourage my students to critique my ideas, and to use a "devil's advocate" approach upon occasion.

5) IF YOU'D LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE AN ARTICLE (POST) ON A TOPIC OF YOUR CHOOSING INSTEAD, THEN EMAIL ME THE POST AND I'LL PUT IT ON THE BLOG. (JBuxton564@cox.net)




Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Mom spells out problems with PARCC Common Core test

By Valerie Strauss;  January 8, 2015; Washington Post

Sarah Blaine is a mother, former teacher and full-time practicing attorney in New Jersey. She just testified to the New Jersey Board of Education urging members to pull out of PARCC, the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, which is one of the two multi-state consortia designing new Common Core standardized tests with some $360 million in federal funds. PARCC has been losing members as one state after another has withdrawn, choosing to use its own tests.

Blaine wrote on her blog, Parenting the Core, about the board meeting where about 100 parents, students, teachers, school board members, and other New Jersey professionals gathered at the River View Executive Building Complex in Trenton to “prove just how out of touch New Jersey Commissioner of Education David Hespe is with New Jersey parents, students, teachers, and community members.” She wrote:

In particular, as you may recall, David Hespe claimed that there was no opt-out or test refusal movement in New Jersey. Today, we proved him wrong. For those who don’t recall, on October 30, 2014, then Acting Commissioner Hespe issued guidance to school districts and charter school leaders in which he suggested (but did not require) that they institute punitive measures in an attempt to squelch New Jersey’s opt-out/test refusal movement before it got started. Hespe’s guidance backfired. Instead, he just pissed me — and countless other New Jersey parents — off…. (Hespe’s real boss is Governor Chris Christie, and there is no doubt in my mind that regardless of what the NJBOE does next, Hespe will continue to dance to PARCC’s tune until Governor Christie tells him to change course).

Blaine has written several popular posts published on this blog, including “Pearson’s wrong answer–and why it matters in the high-stakes testing era,” and “You think you know what teachers do. Right? Wrong.” Her daughter, 10-year-old Elizabeth Blaine, testified before the Montclair school board about the PARCC test, which you can read about here. She gave me permission to publish her testimony and other material.

Here’s her testimony (and you can watch the video of her delivering it below):

I am here today to urge New Jersey to join the other states that have pulled out of the PARCC consortium. Because my older daughter is a 4th grader, I have reviewed the 4th grade PARCC practice materials. I urge you to do the same. Based on my review and the detrimental test prep I’m seeing, I stand here today to tell you that the PARCC does not support the goals of taxpayer-funded public education.

Why do we pay for public education? We pay for education because democracy cannot function effectively unless citizens are sufficiently educated to conduct the business of democracy. Educated citizens evaluate issues within their broader historical and political contexts when they enter the election booth or the jury box.

Now, a happy by-product of educating citizens is that educated citizens are also prepared for college and career. But we taxpayers don’t pay to educate other people’s children because we want to educate the next Steve Jobs or Warren Buffet: rather, we pay for the education of all kids because when we are elderly and today’s kids are voting, we want them to vote thoughtfully.

The PARCC evaluates future employees; it does not educate citizens. Why?

Beyond appearing from its sample questions to be a terrible test, the PARCC only purports to test a narrow subset of what our children should be learning: their reading, writing, and math skills. In addition, New Jersey has attached high-stakes consequences — including teachers’ evaluations — to kids’ scores. This combination pressures teachers and schools to teach to the PARCC.

But when school time is spent on test prep, school time is not devoted to other, more worthy endeavors. When tests are high-stakes, if a topic won’t be tested, it isn’t taught. That is why the PARCC harms citizenship education.

So what don’t our kids do in school because of high-stakes testing such as the PARCC?

Well, I’m a New Jersey native who was educated in the Millburn Public Schools. When I was a 4th grader, our social studies theme was New Jersey. We were each assigned a county, and we spent weeks researching and writing about our counties. I had Cumberland County, which is why I know about New Jersey’s cranberry bogs. We studied Lenni Lenape society and built a model Lenni Lenape village. We learned a then-candidate for New Jersey state song — don’t worry, I won’t sing. We studied New Jersey colonial history and took a field trip to Allaire Village, where we learned about smelting iron. We even created a giant latchhook rug of a map of New Jersey’s 21 counties. Miss Shades’ fourth grade helped me on the road toward thoughtful citizenship.

I now have a fourth grader in the Montclair Public Schools. Her teachers are dedicated and caring. And their fourth grade social studies theme is also New Jersey. However, we’re now about halfway through the school year. My daughter hasn’t studied the Lenni Lenape or memorized New Jersey’s 21 counties. She hasn’t learned about cranberry bogs or iron ore. She hasn’t written a research report on a New Jersey county or latchhooked a map of New Jersey or learned a New Jersey song. She hasn’t taken a field trip to Allaire State Park or learned about colonial settlement of New Jersey.

Instead, she had a generic unit on map skills because reading a map might be tested on the PARCC. She gets to bubble in answers on “Common Core aligned” Scholastic News pamphlets. And she’s learned the states that comprise the Northeast. In half a school year, that’s been it for social studies.

But she’s had hours of PARCC preparation. She and her class have given up 6 class periods — with more scheduled — to learn how to drag and drop and use the PARCC protractor, even though they haven’t gotten to the study of angles in math class yet, so the kids don’t know what a protractor is. She’s brought home formulas for essay writing, which she’s required to follow, regardless of how bad the resulting writing is. She isn’t allowed to use the essay formulas as guides rather than rules, because Pearson’s essay graders will be looking for formulaic essays rather than compelling content.

PARCC test prep is not preparing her to be a thoughtful citizen. PARCC test prep is not using my tax dollars to ensure that she will be prepared to vote thoughtfully. PARCC test prep is not teaching her the American history she needs to know who FDR was, and why he said:

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.”


9 comments:

  1. I find Blaine's testimony against PARCC to be very strong and noteworthy. Schools were created to foster young minds and help create free thinking, well educated citizens and the PARCC test is steering schools away from educating their students in this way. Instead, schools are "teaching to the test," teaching students to merely spit back the exact information that the nation wants. Schools are being assessed based on whose students have the best memorization skills and obedience. It is sad that time is taken out of other classes where students could be learning about the world around them to cover concepts and logistics of a test that in the scheme of the lives of these children really does not matter. If the goal of education is to create well informed citizens, then why does it matter if they can use a computerized protractor to measure an angle? Why should the formula a student uses to write an essay matter? Shouldn't he or she be graded on its content and his or her own knowledge rather than structure. The PARCC test takes away students' opportunity to think creatively and come up with solutions to questions and problems in their own ways. Shouldn't the success of a school be determined by whether or not it produces respectful, intrigued, and well informed citizens, not by how well its students can spit back information? Blaine made a fantastic point when she listed all of the things she learned and still remembers about New Jersey when she was in the forth grade, proving that her education helped make her a well informed citizen. Meanwhile, her daughter who is currently in the forth grade is supposed to be learning the same concepts but has yet to learn any. The only work they have done on the topic is stuff that students could potentially be tested on such as map reading skills. I think it is safe to say that although Blaine's generation may have been considered failures for their low test scores, they are in fact much more well rounded and better independent thinkers than the students of today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JK,
      While I completely agree with what Blaine was saying I do have some trouble completely agreeing with your arguments. I am anti- "Teaching for the Test" but I also feel like there needs to be some way to prove that a student is learning. They should be tested on how to use a protractor, and they should be tested on having good structure in their essays. How do you suggest we go about testing students of proving to people that our students are actually learning? We need some foundation or some sort of tangible thing that we can wave in front of administrator's faces to prove that what we do day after day is actually making a difference. Their final test should not be how "well-rounded" they are in society, that just does not cut it. What we need is a way to test but not "teach for the test".

      Delete
    2. MC,
      While I do know that these skills are important and they should be tested, I do not agree with the idea of taking so much time out of the school day to teach kids how to use the computerized protractor or the exact essay structures the graders are looking for. If students are being taught correctly, they should be learning these skills anyway in their normal class periods. Time shouldn't be taken out of the regular school day or other class periods such as science or social studies to cater to the test because in the end, we are not doing our students any favors by taking away their opportunity to discover different topics and be more well rounded students. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not anti testing but I personally think that successful teachers should be able to incorporate these Common Core standards into their lessons without taking away from other aspects of the students' learning.

      Delete
  2. I think that Sarah Blaine has a good point, however things have changed since she was in school. Ms.Blaine points out that time is being taken out of the school day to prepare students for testing, and disagrees with that. What is really happening, though, is students are being prepared for the real world. When students leave school and have jobs, they will only be tested on and expected to know specific things for their future career, and I think that it's good that students are being prepared for the reality of this at a young age. Another thing, is that the material they are being tested on is crucial for the development of a student. What may be seen as irrelevant to one parent, can also be seen as crucial to the development of well-rounded citizens to another.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ID,
      I agree with what you say about “When students leave school and have jobs, they will only be tested on and expected to know specific things for their future career”. However, I do not find it necessary to try and teach these lessons to students as young as the 4th grade. At that point, educators should focus more on the development of the students and the implementations of the key core values of education into the curriculum. Instead, PARCC is attempting to create a pre-professional atmosphere from the time kids are in elementary school. Although PARCC may want the students to be ready for this kind of preparation at this time, they are simply not ready yet.
      AJ

      Delete
    2. ID,

      Although I fully respect your opinion, I disagree that this new system of testing is preparing young students for the “real world”. I am a supporter of a more traditional liberal arts curriculum which would focus on the content that PPARC addresses. However, the emphasis placed on the PPARC exams are posing a hindrance on students learning opportunities. In the article the mother focuses on her 4th grade child, so I will too. Back when I was in elementary school we learned about some history and science topics but there was little emphasis placed on them. But instead of listening to our teacher lecture about history we would do small readings about historical events that happened around us and then do a project or go on a field trip to the sites. In elementary school we focused on early American history and Native Americans. Our close proximity to history allowed us to learn about the Mayflower and the Pilgrims and then takes trips to sites such as Plymouth Plantation which put the history in front of our eyes. With PPARC, history isn’t even a subject tested so schools now would never be able to take away a day of preparing for PPARC to visit the living history around us. Since you say that PPARC is preparing children for their future career, what about all the kids who want to go into history or science fields? I recognize that math and ELA material is essential and children need a strong background in these for any chosen career path but especially as children get older and may figure out what kinds of job they want to pursue, will there be time in the school day for them to discover and experience new studies? With implementing PPARC it may seem like these opportunities of exploring and finding who they want to be are being taken away from students of all ages.

      SP

      Delete
    3. AJ and SP,

      I see where you're coming from now and I understand that this did apply to a fourth grader. Maybe testing at such a young age isn't the right path, however I do think that maybe further down the line testing is critical to see where a student lies in regard to how much material they absorbed. Children are our future, and maybe at least exposing them to testing will help them better adjust in the future when they are required to be tested in certain subjects.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There has been a lot of talk about the new nationwide standardized test named the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). PARCC follows the guidelines of the Common Core curriculum, which has also received quite a bit of criticism since its release. Parents of students who are being exposed to these tests and curriculums are complaining that their tax-payer money is not being spent wisely, and that the PARCC test only tests on a small fraction of information that the children have learned in the classroom. Plus, some states such as New Jersey are adding higher stakes to the tests as well: Teacher performance is being linked to students’ scores on the test, which is putting excess pressure on the teachers to educate their students about Common Core to the t. With regards to the creators of the exams and the curriculum, it seems as if they are setting up these students to fail. For example, in a 4th grade class where the students hadn’t learned angles yet, the students were required to use protractors on the PARCC practice exams when a majority of the students had never seen nor used a protractor in their educational career. Moreover, students are losing out on memorable experiences in their elementary school years to practice for these PARCC exams. Valerie Strauss claims how her daughter has not been on any field trips for her social studies class, but instead has had to study geographical maps because they may be tested on during the PARCC examinations. Overall, PARCC is taking over the United States’ education system, but it is not leading it in the right direction.

    AJ

    ReplyDelete