by Dan McGowan, WPRI.com
Reporter; PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI)
NOTE: THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED MARCH 9, 2015
So what should you know about the PARCC? Here’s an overview.
1. It’s not NECAP.
For the first time in
nine years, public school students in Rhode Island will not take the New
England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) exam, the standardized reading and
mathematics assessments that were also administered in Vermont, New Hampshire
and Maine (though students will continue to take NECAP science test). The PARCC
is considered more aligned with the Common Core State Standards (see more
below), but one of the most glaring differences between the old test and the
new test is when they’re given. Students in grades 3-8 and 11 took the NECAP
each October, which led some to believe that summer vacation learning loss led
to artificially low scores. Students in grades 3-8 and in high school – most
9th and 10th grade students, as well as some 11th graders – will take the first
part of the PARCC between March 16 and April 10 and the end-of-year assessments
will be administered between May 1 and June 4.
2. It is
computer-based.
While there is an
option to take a paper version of the PARCC, the majority of students will take
the test on computers – a significant shift from previous standardized exams.
The test focuses on mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) and will
require students to use critical thinking skills and explain their answers.
There is a much larger emphasis on writing skills with the PARCC. For the first
part of the exam, students will have two math sessions and three
reading/writing sessions. The end-of-year assessments will include two sessions
of math for all grades. Students in grades 3-5 will have one reading/writing
session and students in grades 6 and up will have two reading/writing sessions.
3. It is not a
graduation requirement… yet.
At the end of the
2014 legislative session, state lawmakers approved a bill that placed a
moratorium on using the results on a standardized test as part of Rhode
Island’s high school graduation policy until the class of 2017 (the state’s
current high school sophomores). Education Commissioner Deborah Gist has
proposed delaying those requirements until the class of 2020 (current 7th
graders). The state has not yet mapped out how well students will be required
to perform in order to be eligible for a diploma. There are two other things
you should know about how the PARCC will affect students. 1) Beginning in 2017,
results in the PARCC will be included on a student’s college transcripts. 2)
Results on the PARCC will not be reflected on a student’s report card, but they
will assist schools in making course recommendations and offering support to
their students.
4. There is a
major difference between the Common Core and PARCC.
The Common Core State
Standards are just that, standards. They were created by a consortium of
government and education leaders in 48 states and Washington, D.C., and have
been adopted in 43 states, including Rhode Island. The Common Core functions as
a set of expectations – not a national curriculum – for what students should
have mastered over the course of time at various grade levels (read the ELA
standards here and the math standards here). The goal is to ensure that all
students graduate from high school prepared for college and ready to enter the
workforce. (It’s worth noting there is plenty of controversy around these
standards; former assistant U.S. Secretary of Education Diane Ravitch is among
the vocal critics.) The PARCC is an exam designed to test whether a student has
mastered the Common Core standards for their grade level. The assessment will
be used by 11 states and Washington, D.C. Other states will use the Smarter
Balanced exam.
5. There is a
controversy over opting out.
Rhode Island has no
formal policy that allows students to opt out of taking the PARCC exam, but
just as with any test given in school, teachers have no way of forcing a
student to participate. In other states, there has been a groundswell of
support for refusing to take the test. In New Mexico, for example, more than
1,000 students walked out of school on the first day of testing; the same thing
happened in New Jersey. Generally, the argument for not taking the exam is that
it takes away from actual learning time (see more below), but you can also read
Ravitch’s blog post on other reasons why students should opt out. That doesn’t
mean there aren’t consequences, however. Any school that receives Title I funds
from the federal government (this is money that goes to schools with
disadvantaged students) is required to have at least 95% of their students
participate in annual standardized exams. Several school districts have warned
that failing to participate could affect federal funding, but Gist’s office
said it doesn’t believe that is the case. While Gist has recommended that all
Rhode Island students participate in the exam, there are school districts that
have asked parents to inform them if they plan to have their children skip the
PARCC. In South Kingstown, for example, parents are required to submit a
request in writing by March 11. Meanwhile, the state’s largest teachers’ union
has asked the state to inform parents of their right to have their children opt
out of the test.
6. Testing does
take time out of the school day.
In Rhode Island, the
first part of the PARCC is expected to take between six and nine hours and the
end-of-year assessment is expected to between three and six hours. That’s
assuming the state doesn’t face some of the same glitches New Jersey
encountered a few weeks ago. By comparison, the NECAP took approximately 8.5
hours to administer. That does not include any preparation work happening in
classrooms during the weeks and months leading up the exam.
7. The results
will help teachers adjust teaching methods.
If the amount of time
spent on testing is a downside to any standardized exam, the upside is that
results should help teachers do more of what works and less of what doesn’t
when in it comes to classroom instruction. Teachers and school leaders will be
able to compare performance with other schools both in and out of the state.
They’ll be able to look at schools with similar populations and share best
practices. Compare that with the NECAP, which wasn’t administered in
Connecticut or Massachusetts, and you can see why some education leaders do see
potential with the PARCC.
8. Students are
being used as guinea pigs.
When students across
the country participated in field testing for both the PARCC and Smarter
Balanced exams last year to help iron out any kinks before full implementation
of each assessment, Valerie Strauss of the Washington Post referred to them as
guinea pigs. That’s still the case this year, but it isn’t necessarily a bad
thing. The Common Core probably isn’t going anywhere any time soon and the exam
will give schools the first comprehensive look at how close (or far) students
are from mastering those standards. The PARCC will help schools build interim
assessments and inform them on how to set the bar when it comes to the Common
Core. School leaders in Rhode Island have taken to referring to PARCC as an
“educational GPS system,” designed to help teachers and parents understand
where a student is academically and find the best route to get them to where
they’re supposed to be.
9. Teachers
evaluations will eventually include PARCC.
As it stands now,
results on the PARCC assessment are expected to be used to calculate student
growth scores for teachers. But educators will first need three years of test
results in order to measure growth, so the PARCC won’t be a factor in teacher
evaluations until the 2016-17 school year. During the 2013-14 school year, 98%
of all teachers in Rhode Island were rated effective or highly effective.
10. There are lots
of accommodations for students who need it.
Schools are allowed
to give students with learning disabilities or English language learners more
time to complete the exam. Certain students are also allowed to take the exam
in small groups, have frequent break periods, test at different time of day or
in a different location or use adaptive or specialized equipment or furniture.
And of course, for those school systems that aren’t quite prepared for the
technology associated with the exam, paper tests are available.
11. Massachusetts
is replacing the MCAS with the PARCC.
Our neighbors to the
north are widely considered the model for public school systems in the United
States and even they’re moving away from the Massachusetts Comprehensive
Assessment System (MCAS) exam that they’ve used for two decades in favor of the
PARCC exam. High school students will still use the MCAS for graduation policy
purposes until the class of 2019, but education officials have said they
believe the PARCC exam will ultimately help Massachusetts close achievement gaps
between poor and wealthy students. (No surprise, Ravitch thinks this is a bad
idea.) New Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker also isn’t completely sold on the
PARCC.
12. We have no
clue how students will do.
Teachers and school
leaders are pointing to the abysmal scores on Common Core-aligned exams in New
York as an example of what Rhode Island could face, but no one quite knows
exactly how students will perform during the benchmark year. The results from
the field exam last year weren’t released at all. Here’s what we do know: 1)
Roughly 71% of principals in Massachusetts think the PARCC is more demanding
than the MCAS. 2) There have been complaints that the questions are worded in
confusing ways. 3) Rhode Island’s track record on other standardized exams is
mixed. The state has made improvements on the National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP), but 36% of students in the class of 2015 scored
substantially below proficient on the math or English section of the NECAP exam
last year (if the state’s high school graduation policy was in place this year,
those students would have forced the retake the exam).
Dan McGowan (
dmcgowan@wpri.com ) covers politics, education and the city of Providence for
WPRI.com. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter: @danmcgowan
Item #5 has been
updated to reflect that while several school departments have said a failure to
participate could result in a loss in federal funding, the Department of
Education does not believe that is the case.
Standardized testing has become a fairly debated topic over the past few years. While I was still in high school, there was a lot of controversy over whether or not the SAT/ACT standardized exam results could have been affected simply because some (a relatively large amount, for that matter) just are not good test takers. During my time in the Introductory class I've heard a lot of students talk about how they were required to pass a certain standardized exam in order to graduate. Never have I ever heard of such an idea. I think it is ridiculous to require students to pass an exam in order to graduate. They have spent an enormous amount of time successfully passing classes that are aimed at a general/broad knowledge readying the students for college and the workforce. Why is that not enough?
ReplyDeleteIn regards to the PARCC specifically, I think it looks like a pretty generic standardized test and we won't know whether it is successful until it is put into these high schools and we get more results back. As I previously mentioned, though, I think it is a smart idea to not have this test as a requirement to graduate. Additionally, I think it will put more pressure on teachers if this exam is used as a measurement for the success of their students. For example, if a teacher's class does extraordinarily well on his/her final exam, and then fails to succeed at the PARCC, what does this say about his/her teaching? Also, although there is a minimum of 3 years of testing in order for the measurement to take place, students will only be taking this exam 2 or 3 times. More than likely their grades will not be incredibly high just due to their being newly introduced into the exam.
Standardized testing has become a fairly debated topic over the past few years. While I was still in high school, there was a lot of controversy over whether or not the SAT/ACT standardized exam results could have been affected simply because some (a relatively large amount, for that matter) just are not good test takers. During my time in the Introductory class I've heard a lot of students talk about how they were required to pass a certain standardized exam in order to graduate. Never have I ever heard of such an idea. I think it is ridiculous to require students to pass an exam in order to graduate. They have spent an enormous amount of time successfully passing classes that are aimed at a general/broad knowledge readying the students for college and the workforce. Why is that not enough?
ReplyDeleteIn regards to the PARCC specifically, I think it looks like a pretty generic standardized test and we won't know whether it is successful until it is put into these high schools and we get more results back. As I previously mentioned, though, I think it is a smart idea to not have this test as a requirement to graduate. Additionally, I think it will put more pressure on teachers if this exam is used as a measurement for the success of their students. For example, if a teacher's class does extraordinarily well on his/her final exam, and then fails to succeed at the PARCC, what does this say about his/her teaching? Also, although there is a minimum of 3 years of testing in order for the measurement to take place, students will only be taking this exam 2 or 3 times. More than likely their grades will not be incredibly high just due to their being newly introduced into the exam.