How to grade reflections
in Intro to Am.Ed.? Should reflections even be part of Am. Ed.?
Buxton’s “grading” of
reflections is subjective and imprecise. A “New Reflection Rubric” was given to you in class on March 10th. (Note: this rubric is not meant to be taken seriously) This rubric is not subjective, and it is precise, but it has numerous problems.
Can you offer an alternative? Do you have comments regarding this dilemma? English teachers - how do you deal with the subjectivity in your assessments? Math - Science - are you happy that your assessments are more "fact based"?
I believe that reflections should not be a part of American Education. In my opinion, grading of assignments should try to stay away from arbitration as much as possible, leading to a fair playing field for all students. With reflections though, grading is very subjective and can be based on a multitude of factors. For example, on some days, students are allowed to choose their own topic for reflections. How can a professor possibly compare two essays that are written about completely different topics? In short, they can’t if they want to ensure grading equity. My proposition would be to get rid of the reflections, as I feel they do not add any value to the class as a whole, nor do I really gain a lot from writing them. When referring to the curriculum, to get a four, a reflection should be two full pages, using more than five quotes from the text, and the student must make three outside connections. I believe this system of grading is unfair, and causes students to complete a task far more advanced than it needs to be. If it is impossible to extricate reflections from the curriculum, I believe that the reflections should be graded based on completion, meaning whether or not it was completed. I.e. an on-time, fully completed reflection would get full credit. As a history teacher, I much prefer fact-based assessments than subjective-based because facts are either incorrect or correct; there is no room for speculation or opinion.
ReplyDeleteAJ